Claude Code SkillScientific34 installs

Scientific Writing

"Core skill for the deep research and writing tool. Write scientific manuscripts in full paragraphs (never bullet points). Use two-stage process: (1) create section outlines with key points using research-lookup, (2) convert to flowing prose. IMRAD structure, citations (APA/AMA/Vancouver), figures/tables, reporting guidelines (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA), for research papers and journal submissions."

Install with the Claude Code Templates CLI
$ npx claude-code-templates@latest --skill="scientific/scientific-writing" --yes

Requires Claude Code. The command adds this skill to your project's .claudedirectory — nothing runs on ToolZip's servers.

What's inside this skill

Component source (preview)

Scientific Writing

Overview

This is the core skill for the deep research and writing tool—combining AI-driven deep research with well-formatted written outputs. Every document produced is backed by comprehensive literature search and verified citations through the research-lookup skill.

Scientific writing is a process for communicating research with precision and clarity. Write manuscripts using IMRAD structure, citations (APA/AMA/Vancouver), figures/tables, and reporting guidelines (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA). Apply this skill for research papers and journal submissions.

Critical Principle: Always write in full paragraphs with flowing prose. Never submit bullet points in the final manuscript. Use a two-stage process: first create section outlines with key points using research-lookup, then convert those outlines into complete paragraphs.

When to Use This Skill

This skill should be used when:

  • Writing or revising any section of a scientific manuscript (abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion)
  • Structuring a research paper using IMRAD or other standard formats
  • Formatting citations and references in specific styles (APA, AMA, Vancouver, Chicago, IEEE)
  • Creating, formatting, or improving figures, tables, and data visualizations
  • Applying study-specific reporting guidelines (CONSORT for trials, STROBE for observational studies, PRISMA for reviews)
  • Drafting abstracts that meet journal requirements (structured or unstructured)
  • Preparing manuscripts for submission to specific journals
  • Improving writing clarity, conciseness, and precision
  • Ensuring proper use of field-specific terminology and nomenclature
  • Addressing reviewer comments and revising manuscripts

Visual Enhancement with Scientific Schematics

⚠️ MANDATORY: Every scientific paper MUST include at least 1-2 AI-generated figures using the scientific-schematics skill.

This is not optional. Scientific papers without visual elements are incomplete. Before finalizing any document:

  • Generate at minimum ONE schematic or diagram using scientific-schematics
  • Prefer 2-3 figures for comprehensive papers (methods flowchart, results visualization, conceptual diagram)

How to generate figures:
  • Use the scientific-schematics skill to generate AI-powered publication-quality diagrams
  • Simply describe your desired diagram in natural language
  • Nano Banana Pro will automatically generate, review, and refine the schematic

How to generate schematics:
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "your diagram description" -o figures/output.png

The AI will automatically:

  • Create publication-quality images with proper formatting
  • Review and refine through multiple iterations
  • Ensure accessibility (colorblind-friendly, high contrast)
  • Save outputs in the figures/ directory

When to add schematics:
  • Study design and methodology flowcharts (CONSORT, PRISMA, STROBE)
  • Conceptual framework diagrams
  • Experimental workflow illustrations
  • Data analysis pipeline diagrams
  • Biological pathway or mechanism diagrams
  • System architecture visualizations
  • Any complex concept that benefits from visualization

For detailed guidance on creating schematics, refer to the scientific-schematics skill documentation.


Core Capabilities

1. Manuscript Structure and Organization

IMRAD Format: Guide papers through the standard Introduction, Methods, Results, And Discussion structure used across most scientific disciplines. This includes:
  • Introduction: Establish research context, identify gaps, state objectives
  • Methods: Detail study design, populations, procedures, and analysis approaches
  • Results: Present findings objectively without interpretation
  • Discussion: Interpret results, acknowledge limitations, propose future directions

For detailed guidance on IMRAD structure, refer to references/imrad_structure.md.

Alternative Structures: Support discipline-specific formats including:
  • Review articles (narrative, systematic, scoping)
  • Case reports and case series
  • Meta-analyses and pooled analyses
  • Theoretical/modeling papers
  • Methods papers and protocols

2. Section-Specific Writing Guidance

Abstract Composition: Craft concise, standalone summaries (100-250 words) that capture the paper's purpose, methods, results, and conclusions. Support both structured abstracts (with labeled sections) and unstructured single-paragraph formats. Introduction Development: Build compelling introductions that:
  • Establish the research problem's importance
  • Review relevant literature systematically
  • Identify knowledge gaps or controversies
  • State clear research questions or hypotheses
  • Explain the study's novelty and significance

Methods Documentation: Ensure reproducibility through:
  • Detailed participant/sample descriptions
  • Clear procedural documentation
  • Statistical methods with justification
  • Equipment and materials specifications
  • Ethical approval and consent statements

Results Presentation: Present findings with:
  • Logical flow from primary to secondary outcomes
  • Integration with figures and tables
  • Statistical significance with effect sizes
  • Objective reporting without interpretation

Discussion Construction: Synthesize findings by:
  • Relating results to research questions
  • Comparing with existing literature
  • Acknowledging limitations honestly
  • Proposing mechanistic explanations
  • Suggesting practical implications and future research

3. Citation and Reference Management

Apply citation styles correctly across disciplines. For comprehensive style guides, refer to references/citation_styles.md.

Major Citation Styles:
  • AMA (American Medical Association): Numbered superscript citations, common in medicine
  • Vancouver: Numbered citations in square brackets, biomedical standard
  • APA (American Psychological Association): Author-date in-text citations, common in social sciences
  • Chicago: Notes-bibliography or author-date, humanities and sciences
  • IEEE: Numbered square brackets, engineering and computer science

Best Practices:
  • Cite primary sources when possible
  • Include recent literature (last 5-10 years for active fields)
  • Balance citation distribution across introduction and discussion
  • Verify all citations against original sources
  • Use reference management software (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote)

4. Figures and Tables

Create effective data visualizations that enhance comprehension. For detailed best practices, refer to references/figures_tables.md.

When to Use Tables vs. Figures:
  • Tables: Precise numerical data, complex datasets, multiple variables requiring exact values
  • Figures: Trends, patterns, relationships, comparisons best understood visually

Design Principles:
  • Make each table/figure self-explanatory with complete captions
  • Use consistent formatting and terminology across all display items
  • Label all axes, columns, and rows with units
  • Include sample sizes (n) and statistical annotations
  • Follow the "one table/figure per 1000 words" guideline
  • Avoid duplicating information between text, tables, and figures

Common Figure Types:
  • Bar graphs: Comparing discrete categories
  • Line graphs: Showing trends over time
  • Scatterplots: Displaying correlations
  • Box plots: Showing distributions and outliers
  • Heatmaps: Visualizing matrices and patterns

5. Reporting Guidelines by Study Type

Ensure completeness and transparency by following established reporting standards. For comprehensive guideline details, refer to references/reporting_guidelines.md.

Key Guidelines:
  • CONSORT: Randomized controlled trials
  • STROBE: Observational studies (cohort, case-control, cross-sectional)
  • PRISMA: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
  • STARD: Diagnostic accuracy studies
  • TRIPOD: Prediction model studies
  • ARRIVE: Animal research
  • CARE: Case reports
  • SQUIRE: Quality improvement studies
  • SPIRIT: Study protocols for clinical trials
  • CHEERS: Economic evaluations

Each guideline provides checklists ensuring all critical methodological elements are reported.

6. Writing Principles and Style

Apply fundamental scientific writing principles. For detailed guidance, refer to references/writing_principles.md.

Clarity:
  • Use precise, unambiguous language
  • Define technical terms and abbreviations at first use
  • Maintain logical flow within and between paragraphs
  • Use active voice when appropriate for clarity

Conciseness:
  • Eliminate redundant words and phrases
  • Favor shorter sentences (15-20 words average)
  • Remove unnecessary qualifiers
  • Respect word limits strictly

Accuracy:
  • Report exact values with appropriate precision
  • Use consistent terminology throughout
  • Distinguish between observations and interpretations
  • Acknowledge uncertainty appropriately

Objectivity:
  • Present results without bias
  • Avoid overstating findings or implications
  • Acknowledge conflicting evidence
  • Maintain professional, neutral tone

7. Writing Process: From Outline to Full Paragraphs

CRITICAL: Always write in full paragraphs, never submit bullet points in scientific papers.

Scientific papers must be written in complete, flowing prose. Use this two-stage approach for effective writing:

Stage 1: Create Section Outlines with Key Points

When starting a new section:

  • Use the research-lookup skill to gather relevant literature and data
  • Create a structured outline with bullet points marking:
- Main arguments or findings to present

- Key studies to cite

- Data points and statistics to include

- Logical flow and organization

  • These bullet points serve as scaffolding—they are NOT the final manuscript

Example outline (Introduction section):
- Background: AI in drug discovery gaining traction
  * Cite recent reviews (Smith 2023, Jones 2024)
  * Traditional methods are slow and expensive
- Gap: Limited application to rare diseases
  * Only 2 prior studies (Lee 2022, Chen 2023)
  * Small datasets remain a challenge
- Our approach: Transfer learning from common diseases
  * Novel architecture combining X and Y
- Study objectives: Validate on 3 rare disease datasets
Stage 2: Convert Key Points to Full Paragraphs

Once the outline is complete, expand each bullet point into proper prose:

  • Transform bullet points into complete sentences with subjects, verbs, and objects
  • Add transitions between sentences and ideas (however, moreover, in contrast, subsequently)
  • Integrate citations naturally within sentences, not as lists
  • Expand with context and explanation that bullet points omit
  • Ensure logical flow from one sentence to the next within each paragraph
  • Vary sentence structure to maintain reader engagement

Example conversion to prose:

```

Artificial intelligence approaches have gained significant traction in drug discovery

pipelines over the past decade (Smith, 2023; Jones, 2024). While these computational

methods show promise for accelerating the identification of therapeutic candidates,

traditional experimental approaches remain slow and resource-intensive, often requiring

years of laboratory work and substantial financial investment. However, the application

of AI to rare diseases has been limited, with only two prior studies demonstrating

proof-of-concept results (Lee, 2022; Chen, 2023). The primary obstacle has been the

scarcity of training data for conditions affecting small patient populations.

To address this challenge, we developed a transfer learning approach that leverages

knowledge from well-characterized common diseases to predict therapeutic targets for

rare conditions. Our novel neural architecture combines convolutional layers for

molecular feature extraction with attention mechanisms for protein-ligand interaction

modeling. The objective of this study was to validate our approac

Preview truncated. View the full source on GitHub →

Type
Skill
Category
Scientific
Installs
34
Source
GitHub ↗

Related Claude Code Skills

SkillScientific

Generate Image

Generate or edit images using AI models (FLUX, Gemini). Use for general-purpose image generation including photos, illustrations, artwork, visual assets, concept art, and any image that isn't a technical diagram or schematic. For flowcharts, circuits, pathways, and technical diagrams, use the scientific-schematics skill instead.

99 installsView →
SkillScientific

Markitdown

"Convert files and office documents to Markdown. Supports PDF, DOCX, PPTX, XLSX, images (with OCR), audio (with transcription), HTML, CSV, JSON, XML, ZIP, YouTube URLs, EPubs and more."

72 installsView →
SkillScientific

Scientific Critical Thinking

"Evaluate research rigor. Assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, evidence quality (GRADE, Cochrane ROB), for critical analysis of scientific claims."

66 installsView →
SkillScientific

Scientific Slides

"Build slide decks and presentations for research talks. Use this for making PowerPoint slides, conference presentations, seminar talks, research presentations, thesis defense slides, or any scientific talk. Provides slide structure, design templates, timing guidance, and visual validation. Works with PowerPoint and LaTeX Beamer."

52 installsView →
SkillScientific

Statistical Analysis

"Statistical analysis toolkit. Hypothesis tests (t-test, ANOVA, chi-square), regression, correlation, Bayesian stats, power analysis, assumption checks, APA reporting, for academic research."

40 installsView →
SkillScientific

Market Research Reports

"Generate comprehensive market research reports (50+ pages) in the style of top consulting firms (McKinsey, BCG, Gartner). Features professional LaTeX formatting, extensive visual generation with scientific-schematics and generate-image, deep integration with research-lookup for data gathering, and multi-framework strategic analysis including Porter's Five Forces, PESTLE, SWOT, TAM/SAM/SOM, and BCG Matrix."

39 installsView →

Catalog data and component content are sourced from the open-source davila7/claude-code-templates project (MIT license). ToolZip curates the listing and writes original descriptions; every component links back to its original source. Claude Code is a product of Anthropic. ToolZip is an independent catalog and is not affiliated with or endorsed by Anthropic.