Scikit Survival
Comprehensive toolkit for survival analysis and time-to-event modeling in Python using scikit-survival. Use this skill when working with censored survival data, performing time-to-event analysis, fitting Cox models, Random Survival Forests, Gradient Boosting models, or Survival SVMs, evaluating survival predictions with concordance index or Brier score, handling competing risks, or implementing any survival analysis workflow with the scikit-survival library.
$ npx claude-code-templates@latest --skill="scientific/scikit-survival" --yesRequires Claude Code. The command adds this skill to your project's .claudedirectory — nothing runs on ToolZip's servers.
What's inside this skill
Component source (preview)
scikit-survival: Survival Analysis in Python
Overview
scikit-survival is a Python library for survival analysis built on top of scikit-learn. It provides specialized tools for time-to-event analysis, handling the unique challenge of censored data where some observations are only partially known.
Survival analysis aims to establish connections between covariates and the time of an event, accounting for censored records (particularly right-censored data from studies where participants don't experience events during observation periods).
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Performing survival analysis or time-to-event modeling
- Working with censored data (right-censored, left-censored, or interval-censored)
- Fitting Cox proportional hazards models (standard or penalized)
- Building ensemble survival models (Random Survival Forests, Gradient Boosting)
- Training Survival Support Vector Machines
- Evaluating survival model performance (concordance index, Brier score, time-dependent AUC)
- Estimating Kaplan-Meier or Nelson-Aalen curves
- Analyzing competing risks
- Preprocessing survival data or handling missing values in survival datasets
- Conducting any analysis using the scikit-survival library
Core Capabilities
1. Model Types and Selection
scikit-survival provides multiple model families, each suited for different scenarios:
Cox Proportional Hazards Models
Use for: Standard survival analysis with interpretable coefficientsCoxPHSurvivalAnalysis: Basic Cox modelCoxnetSurvivalAnalysis: Penalized Cox with elastic net for high-dimensional dataIPCRidge: Ridge regression for accelerated failure time models
references/cox-models.md for detailed guidance on Cox models, regularization, and interpretation
Ensemble Methods
Use for: High predictive performance with complex non-linear relationshipsRandomSurvivalForest: Robust, non-parametric ensemble methodGradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis: Tree-based boosting for maximum performanceComponentwiseGradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis: Linear boosting with feature selectionExtraSurvivalTrees: Extremely randomized trees for additional regularization
references/ensemble-models.md for comprehensive guidance on ensemble methods, hyperparameter tuning, and when to use each model
Survival Support Vector Machines
Use for: Medium-sized datasets with margin-based learningFastSurvivalSVM: Linear SVM optimized for speedFastKernelSurvivalSVM: Kernel SVM for non-linear relationshipsHingeLossSurvivalSVM: SVM with hinge lossClinicalKernelTransform: Specialized kernel for clinical + molecular data
references/svm-models.md for detailed SVM guidance, kernel selection, and hyperparameter tuning
Model Selection Decision Tree
Start
├─ High-dimensional data (p > n)?
│ ├─ Yes → CoxnetSurvivalAnalysis (elastic net)
│ └─ No → Continue
│
├─ Need interpretable coefficients?
│ ├─ Yes → CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis or ComponentwiseGradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis
│ └─ No → Continue
│
├─ Complex non-linear relationships expected?
│ ├─ Yes
│ │ ├─ Large dataset (n > 1000) → GradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis
│ │ ├─ Medium dataset → RandomSurvivalForest or FastKernelSurvivalSVM
│ │ └─ Small dataset → RandomSurvivalForest
│ └─ No → CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis or FastSurvivalSVM
│
└─ For maximum performance → Try multiple models and compare
2. Data Preparation and Preprocessing
Before modeling, properly prepare survival data:
Creating Survival Outcomes
from sksurv.util import Surv
# From separate arrays
y = Surv.from_arrays(event=event_array, time=time_array)
# From DataFrame
y = Surv.from_dataframe('event', 'time', df)
Essential Preprocessing Steps
- Handle missing values: Imputation strategies for features
- Encode categorical variables: One-hot encoding or label encoding
- Standardize features: Critical for SVMs and regularized Cox models
- Validate data quality: Check for negative times, sufficient events per feature
- Train-test split: Maintain similar censoring rates across splits
references/data-handling.md for complete preprocessing workflows, data validation, and best practices
3. Model Evaluation
Proper evaluation is critical for survival models. Use appropriate metrics that account for censoring:
Concordance Index (C-index)
Primary metric for ranking/discrimination:
- Harrell's C-index: Use for low censoring (<40%)
- Uno's C-index: Use for moderate to high censoring (>40%) - more robust
from sksurv.metrics import concordance_index_censored, concordance_index_ipcw
# Harrell's C-index
c_harrell = concordance_index_censored(y_test['event'], y_test['time'], risk_scores)[0]
# Uno's C-index (recommended)
c_uno = concordance_index_ipcw(y_train, y_test, risk_scores)[0]
Time-Dependent AUC
Evaluate discrimination at specific time points:
from sksurv.metrics import cumulative_dynamic_auc
times = [365, 730, 1095] # 1, 2, 3 years
auc, mean_auc = cumulative_dynamic_auc(y_train, y_test, risk_scores, times)
Brier Score
Assess both discrimination and calibration:
from sksurv.metrics import integrated_brier_score
ibs = integrated_brier_score(y_train, y_test, survival_functions, times)
See: references/evaluation-metrics.md for comprehensive evaluation guidance, metric selection, and using scorers with cross-validation
4. Competing Risks Analysis
Handle situations with multiple mutually exclusive event types:
from sksurv.nonparametric import cumulative_incidence_competing_risks
# Estimate cumulative incidence for each event type
time_points, cif_event1, cif_event2 = cumulative_incidence_competing_risks(y)
Use competing risks when:
- Multiple mutually exclusive event types exist (e.g., death from different causes)
- Occurrence of one event prevents others
- Need probability estimates for specific event types
references/competing-risks.md for detailed competing risks methods, cause-specific hazard models, and interpretation
5. Non-parametric Estimation
Estimate survival functions without parametric assumptions:
Kaplan-Meier Estimator
from sksurv.nonparametric import kaplan_meier_estimator
time, survival_prob = kaplan_meier_estimator(y['event'], y['time'])
Nelson-Aalen Estimator
from sksurv.nonparametric import nelson_aalen_estimator
time, cumulative_hazard = nelson_aalen_estimator(y['event'], y['time'])
Typical Workflows
Workflow 1: Standard Survival Analysis
from sksurv.datasets import load_breast_cancer
from sksurv.linear_model import CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis
from sksurv.metrics import concordance_index_ipcw
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
# 1. Load and prepare data
X, y = load_breast_cancer()
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)
# 2. Preprocess
scaler = StandardScaler()
X_train_scaled = scaler.fit_transform(X_train)
X_test_scaled = scaler.transform(X_test)
# 3. Fit model
estimator = CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis()
estimator.fit(X_train_scaled, y_train)
# 4. Predict
risk_scores = estimator.predict(X_test_scaled)
# 5. Evaluate
c_index = concordance_index_ipcw(y_train, y_test, risk_scores)[0]
print(f"C-index: {c_index:.3f}")
Workflow 2: High-Dimensional Data with Feature Selection
from sksurv.linear_model import CoxnetSurvivalAnalysis
from sklearn.model_selection import GridSearchCV
from sksurv.metrics import as_concordance_index_ipcw_scorer
# 1. Use penalized Cox for feature selection
estimator = CoxnetSurvivalAnalysis(l1_ratio=0.9) # Lasso-like
# 2. Tune regularization with cross-validation
param_grid = {'alpha_min_ratio': [0.01, 0.001]}
cv = GridSearchCV(estimator, param_grid,
scoring=as_concordance_index_ipcw_scorer(), cv=5)
cv.fit(X, y)
# 3. Identify selected features
best_model = cv.best_estimator_
selected_features = np.where(best_model.coef_ != 0)[0]
Workflow 3: Ensemble Method for Maximum Performance
from sksurv.ensemble import GradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis
from sklearn.model_selection import GridSearchCV
# 1. Define parameter grid
param_grid = {
'learning_rate': [0.01, 0.05, 0.1],
'n_estimators': [100, 200, 300],
'max_depth': [3, 5, 7]
}
# 2. Grid search
gbs = GradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis()
cv = GridSearchCV(gbs, param_grid, cv=5,
scoring=as_concordance_index_ipcw_scorer(), n_jobs=-1)
cv.fit(X_train, y_train)
# 3. Evaluate best model
best_model = cv.best_estimator_
risk_scores = best_model.predict(X_test)
c_index = concordance_index_ipcw(y_train, y_test, risk_scores)[0]
Workflow 4: Comprehensive Model Comparison
from sksurv.linear_model import CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis
from sksurv.ensemble import RandomSurvivalForest, GradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis
from sksurv.svm import FastSurvivalSVM
from sksurv.metrics import concordance_index_ipcw, integrated_brier_score
# Define models
models = {
'Cox': CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis(),
'RSF': RandomSurvivalForest(n_estimators=100, random_state=42),
'GBS': GradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis(random_state=42),
'SVM': FastSurvivalSVM(random_state=42)
}
# Evaluate each model
results = {}
for name, model in models.items():
model.fit(X_train_scaled, y_train)
risk_scores = model.predict(X_test_scaled)
c_index = concordance_index_ipcw(y_train, y_test, risk_scores)[0]
results[name] = c_index
print(f"{name}: C-index = {c_index:.3f}")
# Select best model
best_model_name = max(results, key=results.get)
print(f"\nBest model: {best_model_name}")
Integration with scikit-learn
scikit-survival fully integrates with scikit-learn's ecosystem:
from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score, GridSearchCV
# Use pipelines
pipeline = Pipeline([
('scaler', StandardScaler()),
('model', CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis())
])
# Use cross-validation
scores = cross_val_score(pipeline, X, y, cv=5,
scoring=as_concordance_index_ipcw_scorer())
# Use grid search
param_grid = {'model__alpha': [0.1, 1.0, 10.0]}
cv = GridSearchCV(pipeline, param_grid, cv=5)
cv.fit(X, y)
Best Practices
- Always standardize features for SVMs and regularized Cox models
- Use Uno's C-index instead of Harrell's when censoring > 40%
- Report multiple evaluation metrics (C-index, integrated Brier score, time-dependent AUC)
- Check proportional hazards assumption for Cox models
- Use cross-validation for hyperparameter tuning with appropriate scorers
- Validate data quality before modeling (check for negative times, sufficient events per feature)
- Compare multiple model types to find best performance
- Use permutation importance for Random Survival Forests (not built-in importance)
- Consider competing risks when multiple event types exist
- Document censoring mechanism and rates in analysis
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Using Harrell's C-index with high censoring → Use Uno's C-index
- Not standardizing features for SVMs → Always standardize
- Forgetting to pass y_train to concordance_index_ipcw → Required for IPCW calculation
- Treating competing events as censored → Use competing risks methods
- Not checking for sufficient events per feature → Rule of thumb: 10+ events per feature
- Using built-in feature importance for RSF → Use permutation importance
- Ignoring proportional hazards assumption → Validate or use alternative models
- Not using appropriate scorers in cross-validation → Use as_concordance_index_ipcw_scorer()
Reference Files
This skill includes detailed refer
Preview truncated. View the full source on GitHub →
Related Claude Code Skills
Generate Image
Generate or edit images using AI models (FLUX, Gemini). Use for general-purpose image generation including photos, illustrations, artwork, visual assets, concept art, and any image that isn't a technical diagram or schematic. For flowcharts, circuits, pathways, and technical diagrams, use the scientific-schematics skill instead.
Markitdown
"Convert files and office documents to Markdown. Supports PDF, DOCX, PPTX, XLSX, images (with OCR), audio (with transcription), HTML, CSV, JSON, XML, ZIP, YouTube URLs, EPubs and more."
Scientific Critical Thinking
"Evaluate research rigor. Assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, evidence quality (GRADE, Cochrane ROB), for critical analysis of scientific claims."
Scientific Slides
"Build slide decks and presentations for research talks. Use this for making PowerPoint slides, conference presentations, seminar talks, research presentations, thesis defense slides, or any scientific talk. Provides slide structure, design templates, timing guidance, and visual validation. Works with PowerPoint and LaTeX Beamer."
Statistical Analysis
"Statistical analysis toolkit. Hypothesis tests (t-test, ANOVA, chi-square), regression, correlation, Bayesian stats, power analysis, assumption checks, APA reporting, for academic research."
Market Research Reports
"Generate comprehensive market research reports (50+ pages) in the style of top consulting firms (McKinsey, BCG, Gartner). Features professional LaTeX formatting, extensive visual generation with scientific-schematics and generate-image, deep integration with research-lookup for data gathering, and multi-framework strategic analysis including Porter's Five Forces, PESTLE, SWOT, TAM/SAM/SOM, and BCG Matrix."
Catalog data and component content are sourced from the open-source davila7/claude-code-templates project (MIT license). ToolZip curates the listing and writes original descriptions; every component links back to its original source. Claude Code is a product of Anthropic. ToolZip is an independent catalog and is not affiliated with or endorsed by Anthropic.