Claude Code SkillSentry2 installs

Iterate Pr

Iterate on a PR until CI passes. Use when you need to fix CI failures, address review feedback, or continuously push fixes until all checks are green. Automates the feedback-fix-push-wait cycle.

Install with the Claude Code Templates CLI
$ npx claude-code-templates@latest --skill="sentry/iterate-pr" --yes

Requires Claude Code. The command adds this skill to your project's .claudedirectory — nothing runs on ToolZip's servers.

What's inside this skill

Component source

Iterate on PR Until CI Passes

Continuously iterate on the current branch until all CI checks pass and review feedback is addressed.

Requires: GitHub CLI (gh) authenticated and available.

Process

Step 1: Identify the PR

gh pr view --json number,url,headRefName,baseRefName

If no PR exists for the current branch, stop and inform the user.

Step 2: Check CI Status First

Always check CI/GitHub Actions status before looking at review feedback:

gh pr checks --json name,state,bucket,link,workflow

The bucket field categorizes state into: pass, fail, pending, skipping, or cancel.

Important: If any of these checks are still pending, wait before proceeding:
  • sentry / sentry-io
  • codecov
  • cursor / bugbot / seer
  • Any linter or code analysis checks

These bots may post additional feedback comments once their checks complete. Waiting avoids duplicate work.

Step 3: Gather Review Feedback

Once CI checks have completed (or at least the bot-related checks), gather human and bot feedback:

Review Comments and Status:
gh pr view --json reviews,comments,reviewDecision
Inline Code Review Comments:
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/comments
PR Conversation Comments (includes bot comments):
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{pr_number}/comments

Look for bot comments from: Sentry, Codecov, Cursor, Bugbot, Seer, and other automated tools.

Step 4: Investigate Failures

For each CI failure, get the actual logs:

# List recent runs for this branch
gh run list --branch $(git branch --show-current) --limit 5 --json databaseId,name,status,conclusion

# View failed logs for a specific run
gh run view <run-id> --log-failed

Do NOT assume what failed based on the check name alone. Always read the actual logs.

Step 5: Validate Feedback

For each piece of feedback (CI failure or review comment):

  • Read the relevant code - Understand the context before making changes
  • Verify the issue is real - Not all feedback is correct; reviewers and bots can be wrong
  • Check if already addressed - The issue may have been fixed in a subsequent commit
  • Skip invalid feedback - If the concern is not legitimate, move on

Step 6: Address Valid Issues

Make minimal, targeted code changes. Only fix what is actually broken.

Step 7: Commit and Push

git add -A
git commit -m "fix: <descriptive message of what was fixed>"
git push

Step 8: Wait for CI

Use the built-in watch functionality:

gh pr checks --watch --interval 30

This waits until all checks complete. Exit code 0 means all passed, exit code 1 means failures.

Alternatively, poll manually if you need more control:

gh pr checks --json name,state,bucket | jq '.[] | select(.bucket != "pass")'

Step 9: Repeat

Return to Step 2 if:

  • Any CI checks failed
  • New review feedback appeared

Continue until all checks pass and no unaddressed feedback remains.

Exit Conditions

Success:
  • All CI checks are green (bucket: pass)
  • No unaddressed human review feedback

Ask for Help:
  • Same failure persists after 3 attempts (likely a flaky test or deeper issue)
  • Review feedback requires clarification or decision from the user
  • CI failure is unrelated to branch changes (infrastructure issue)

Stop Immediately:
  • No PR exists for the current branch
  • Branch is out of sync and needs rebase (inform user)

Tips

  • Use gh pr checks --required to focus only on required checks
  • Use gh run view <run-id> --verbose to see all job steps, not just failures
  • If a check is from an external service, the link field in checks JSON provides the URL to investigate
Type
Skill
Category
Sentry
Installs
2
Source
GitHub ↗

Related Claude Code Skills

SkillSentry

Find Bugs

Find bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues in local branch changes. Use when asked to review changes, find bugs, security review, or audit code on the current branch.

83 installsView →
SkillSentry

Deslop

Remove AI-generated code slop from a branch. Use when cleaning up AI-generated code, removing unnecessary comments, defensive checks, or type casts. Checks diff against main and fixes style inconsistencies.

33 installsView →
SkillSentry

Code Review

Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.

28 installsView →
SkillSentry

Commit

Create commit messages following Sentry conventions. Use when committing code changes, writing commit messages, or formatting git history. Follows conventional commits with Sentry-specific issue references.

11 installsView →
SkillSentry

Create Pr

Create pull requests following Sentry conventions. Use when opening PRs, writing PR descriptions, or preparing changes for review. Follows Sentry's code review guidelines.

4 installsView →
SkillCreative Design

Frontend Design

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.

4.2k installsView →

Catalog data and component content are sourced from the open-source davila7/claude-code-templates project (MIT license). ToolZip curates the listing and writes original descriptions; every component links back to its original source. Claude Code is a product of Anthropic. ToolZip is an independent catalog and is not affiliated with or endorsed by Anthropic.